Washington Mutual's Lending Operation: A Boiler Room Environment

Paul Kiesel
Attorney
(866) 735-1102 Ext 385
Visit Paul Kiesel on Avvo
Posted by Paul KieselNovember 04, 2008 3:26 PM

Yesterday, the New York Times reported on a senior mortgage underwriter who had, previous to the subprime and pay option ARM loan boom, been proud of her ability to spot fraud and other problems in loan applications.

Keysha Cooper said she found herself stuck between a rock and a hard place during the latter part of the mortgage boom, as brokers squeezed her from one side, her superiors, like the ones working under disgraced WaMu former CEO Kerry Killinger, pushing her from the other, with both sides pressuring her to approve loans, regardless.

Ms. Cooper told the Times, "At WaMu it wasn't about the quality of loans; it was about the numbers [. . .] They didn't care if we were giving loans to people that didn't qualify. Instead, it was how many loans did you guys close and fund?"

And what if Ms. Cooper didn't approve the loans that were coming through WaMu's doors? She and other mortgage underwriters were punished. The loan officers that were complicit with WaMu's irreverent regard to shareholders and whether or not borrowers could keep current with their payments: They received free trips to places like Hawaii and Jamaica... for a month!

Ms. Cooper was even placed on probation for a month for refusing to approve a loan, which she said was filled with so many discrepancies that is clearly was an example of mortgage fraud.

Why would Washington Mutual want to sell hundreds of thousands of these loans that mirrored or were explicitly deemed fraudulent to loan officers? Because surreptitiously placed throughout the loan documents were several hidden fees and/or penalties, which would result in $20,000 to $40,000 on a loan that was approximately $500,000. Thus, the more TILA violations in the loan, the more money WaMu could rake in.

Kerry Killinger, the recently ousted Chief Executive of this whole guerilla-like, Boiler Room environment, and the man who tops the list of defendants who are being sued by shareholders, should not only be held responsible in paying back the tens of millions of dollars he "pocketed" from Washington Mutual under his helm, but the topic of "prison" should also be thrown into the mix.

5 Comments

Have an opinion about this post? Please consider leaving a comment or subscribing to the feed to have future articles delivered to your feed reader.

bill
Posted by bill
November 05, 2008 5:46 PM

I am not suing him. He made some bad mistakes but so did hundreds of others. I am a shareholder and with hundreds of other shareholders we are more concerned with the extremely questionable actions of the FDIC and JP Morgan in this whole mess. Evidence is now coming to light that suggests insider trading and wanton destruction of this bank by Bair and her cronies. stop being a parrot and do some real research like Bill Virgin of the Seattle PI.

Bill
Posted by Bill
November 05, 2008 5:50 PM

look at this: More ...

bill
Posted by bill
November 05, 2008 5:52 PM

How about someone protecting those rights?

joseph hammang
Posted by joseph hammang
November 06, 2008 11:13 AM

I'm a shareholder of 800 shares of WM for a X cabinetmaker retired that is a hard hit on my savings

Risk Averse
Posted by Risk Averse
November 08, 2008 1:16 AM

These are just my opinions and I don't mean to offend anyone. I feel deep sorrow for those shareholders that lost a lot of money b/c their CEO assured them the firm was fine and it was all market panic. I can see why some folks would purchase a big bank like this for a substantial "discount" at $2.00 a share or whatever price as it was falling to at your particular time. You can get a LOT of shares for cheap and "when it goes back up to $20, if I invest 10k now, my 10k will turn into 100k, I'm going to retire early!" It just amazes me that anybody would put their money on the line (besides discretionary "gambling" money) on ANY stock that trades below $5 a share, especially a huge bank like wamu (or any once Large Cap stock that's beaten down that bad). I realize all have their own opinion and can do what they like, but to me, there is a very good reason the largest savings institution was $2 (or whatever price) a share at that time. The reason being....It was obvious (to Wall Street) they may be broke w/out a cash infusion (which if you think about it.. would you put up money to fund WAMU debt when they didn't have the ability to pay it back and probably never would have the ability? So, the cost of capital was so high they couldn't raise any capital, the only life-line left for GM and F as well! This is not meant to be advice, but I hope it makes you at least ask a few questions before putting up your hard earned dollars on a company that is broke.

P.S. I don't currently own, nor have ever owned, any shares of WAMU or WAMUQ

Comments for this article are closed.

Subscribe to InjuryBoard Los Angeles

InjuryBoard Los Angeles RSS Feeds

Keep up with the latest updates using your favorite RSS reader

Injury Board Los Angeles is brought to you by Kiesel, Boucher & Larson, LLP

Legal Assistance Center

More Info
Kiesel, Boucher & Larson, LLP (866) 735-1102 Ext 385 www.kbla.com
google
Personal Injury Lawyers Serving: LA, Burbank, Compton, Downey, Glendale, Hawthorne, Huntington Park, Inglewood, Lynwood, Monterey Park, Pasadena, Santa Monica, South Gate, West Hollywood, Alhambra, Beverly Hills
8648 Wilshire Boulevard, Beverly Hills, California 90211 [ Show Map ]
Better Business Bureau Accredited Business Confidential

Your question will be referred to an attorney near you. If your question is of a legal nature, then by submitting this form you agree you are not forming a formal attorney / client relationship. Read our full privacy policy.

Looking for an InjuryBoard attorney closer to home? Click here.

Subscribe to Blog Updates

Enter your email address if you would like to receive email notifications when comments are made on this post.

Email address