Obama and McCain: The Presidential Candidates on the Mortgage Crisis

Paul Kiesel
Paul Kiesel
Contributor
Posted by Paul KieselJune 17, 2008 1:50 PM

Here are Barack Obama's and John McCain's plans for dealing with the mortgage crisis (according to each candidate's respective website):

Barack Obama wants to create a fund to help people refinance their mortgages and provide comprehensive support to innocent homeowners. The fund will be partially paid for by Sen. Obama's increased penalties on lenders who act irresponsibly and commit fraud.

On top of this, Sen. Obama will create a 10 percent universal mortgage credit to provide homeowners who do not itemize tax relief. This credit will provide an average of $500 to 10 million homeowners, the majority of whom earn less than $50,000 per year.

After seeing what took place in the subprime mortgage industry, Sen. Obama introduced comprehensive legislation over a year ago to fight mortgage fraud and protect consumers against abusive lending practices. Sen. Obama's STOP FRAUD Act provides the first federal definition of mortgage fraud, increases funding for federal and state law enforcement programs, creates new criminal penalties for mortgage professionals found guilty of fraud, and requires industry insiders to report suspicious activity.

Sen. Obama will also create a Homeowner Obligation Made Explicit (HOME) score, which will provide potential borrowers with a simplified, standardized borrower metric (similar to APR) for home mortgages. The HOME score will allow individuals to easily compare various mortgage products and understand the full cost of the loan.

John McCain, after saying for months that he didn't want the government to intervene in the housing crisis, has recently come up with a housing relief plan called HOME Plan. Under his HOME Plan, every deserving American family or homeowner will be afforded the opportunity to trade a burdensome mortgage for a manageable loan that reflects their home's market value.

In order to be eligible, holders of a non-conventional mortgage taken after 2005 who live in their home (primary residence only); can prove creditworthiness at the time of the original loan; are either delinquent, in arrears on payments, facing a reset or otherwise demonstrate that they will be unable to continue to meet their mortgage obligations; and can meet the terms of a new 30-year fixed-rate mortgage on the existing home.

John McCain has also recently called for the formation of a task force within the Justice Department to combat mortgage fraud, but this has already been in the works for sometime. Sen. McCain's proposal suggests that the task force's primary duty will be to aggressively investigate potential criminal wrongdoing in the mortgage industry and bring to justice any who violated the law. The DOJ Task Force will offer assistance to State Attorneys General who are investigating abusive lending practices. (The FBI has also increased their efforts two, if not, three fold over the last 90 days.)

1 Comment

Have an opinion about this post? Please consider leaving a comment or subscribing to the feed to have future articles delivered to your feed reader.

Stanley Foodman, CPA, CFE
Posted by Stanley Foodman, CPA, CFE
June 18, 2008 11:41 AM

Neither candidate is being honest with the public.

Mr Obama's idea of wanting to create a fund to help people refinance their mortgages and provide comprehensive support to "innocent homeowners" ought to be carefully studied. It conspicuously omits targeting the root cause of the current mortgage debacle affecting our economy. The root cause was a failure of regulated lenders' internal controls with a concurrent implicit and explicit failure of fiduciary responsibilities by the banking industry.

Senator McCain's law enforcement approach is no better. It does not address root causes either.

Homeowners in significant were not entirely innocent either. The get rich quick mentality fostered by the regulated lending industry's artificialy low interest rate allowed buyers to play out "Walter Mitty" type fantasies when buying real estate for which they were not actually qualified.

In other words, why should those who did not participate in the party pay for its costs? I am against any bail out of any lender as well as those who purchased properties for which they were economically unqualified at the time of purchase.

The nitty gritty of all of this is the need for a re-imposition of the historical fiscal discipline by the regulated lending indusrty through its historically conservative internal lending standards tied to a borrower's ability to repay a loan.

Comments for this article are closed.

Subscribe to InjuryBoard Los Angeles

InjuryBoard Los Angeles RSS Feeds

Keep up with the latest updates using your favorite RSS reader

Contact an attorney in your area.

Subscribe to Blog Updates

Enter your email address if you would like to receive email notifications when comments are made on this post.

Email address